Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)" Results 801 - 820 of 2,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
 22-7163, Judge Rao, joined by Judges Katsas and Pan, affirmed the decision of the district court to remand to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia a suit brought by the District asserting that various oil and gas companies violated D. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
His lawsuit raises the constitutional issue of parliamentary immunity, on the basis of which Justice Sally Gomery of the Ontario Superior Court dismissed his claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
R.B., supra.The court went on to point out that theFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: `The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . . [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
In 2011, Guatemalan citizens commenced three actions before the Ontario Superior Court against Hudbay Minerals Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
In 2011, Guatemalan citizens commenced three actions before the Ontario Superior Court against Hudbay Minerals Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The court may grant custody or access to the child to one or more persons. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am by Eric Goldman
Because GOW is merely software downloaded onto a personal gadget, the Court held that the Casino function does not violate California law prohibiting slot machines or devices. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am by Ian Mance
His petition, the first known COVID-19 habeas action to be filed in the state’s superior courts, was denied by the judge, who relied on the portion of G.S. 17-4 stating that a petition for writ of habeas corpus “shall be denied where a person is held pursuant to a valid final judgment in a criminal case entered by a court with proper jurisdiction. [read post]