Search for: "Perry v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
We also draw attention to the following decisions in other jurisdictions: Perry v McIntosh & Ors [2010] VSC 85 (24 March 2010) and Newnham v Davis (No 2) [2010] VSC 94 (1 April 2010) – two decisions of which deal with issues in pleading in a defamation case. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, in which it struck down the federal-law provision of DOMA. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 12:35 am
The Government says that this will align the law with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was incorporated into Scots law last year. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
United States; a very slippery opinion by Chief Justice Hughes.1935-1936: The Court invalidates many other New Deal statutes1936: FDR is reelected overwhelmingly and the Democrats rule the roost for decades.Some generations played out a little differently. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
United States, and three times during the Affordable Care Act cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
In the first case, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
And in Perry v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
See, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Nadine Dorries announced a new pact on the use and exchange of data between the two nations. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
” State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
