Search for: "Plante v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 2,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Then again, the court’s other 2013 decision on exhaustion – the plant-patent ruling in Bowman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:22 am by Ilya Somin
” Thomas is also a longtime critic of the Court’s interpretation of federal power over interstate commerce, most notably in his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am by Edward Smith
  Berkeley, California: A Vibrant Past I’m Ed Smith, a personal injury attorney in Berkeley. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
The victim in this case was coerced into prostitution for Baston in the United States, the United Arab Emirates and her home country of Australia. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As the late Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Antonin Scalia once remarked, Marshall [the first black member of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am by Jared Dummitt, Eliot Kim
The United States, at the time, characterized that seizure as “unlawful. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]