Search for: "Powell v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,590
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
See Powell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Powell. 2009. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
In Powell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
There five published “resolved complaints”: Andrew Newman v Daily Mail (clause 1), Morag Powell v Scotsman (clauses 1 and 3), Bryony Hill v Mail on Sunday (clauses 1, 3 and 4), Sean McGrath v Herald (Glasgow) (clause 1) and Peter Jones v Daily Telegraph (clause 1). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm
Powell. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:03 pm
An IRS Summons is issued in good faith when it meets the four part test set forth in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The case is Sutton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
My first involvement in litigation centered on this question was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:39 pm
More specifically, in Gurley, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
(Hint: the answer ain’t “fifty . . . .)United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:09 am
Powell-Pickett. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm
By Ekaterina Powell, Esq. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:07 am
FEC dissenters and Justices Stewart, Powell, and Douglas. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:54 pm
The case is Gurley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Powell rule that Fourth Amendment claims aren’t cognizable on habeas review, and (2) a habeas court can rely on studies that were not part of the state court record despite Cullen v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Bushta v. [read post]
