Search for: "Powers v. Common Council" Results 801 - 820 of 1,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
It adds: “Both the Ministry of Justice and Southwark Council told Press Gazette they had no power to force the coroner to make the information available to reporters”. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The ICO’s director of FOI and Transparency said that the “Council’s failure to comply with the law erodes trust in democracy and open government. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
The defendants refused, relying inter alia on the ‘personal data of others’ exemption (see DB v General Medical Council), in light of the claimant’s conduct. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm by Cyberleagle
      The significance of context (including the seniority of the council officer, the council officer’s own previous video describing her struggle with mental health issues; and the legal requirement for there to have been more than a single post by the defendant). c. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am by shirley
The courts, as a result of cases like Salamon v Salamon & Co Ltd 1897 AC 22 and Dadoo Ltd v Krugersdorp Municipal Council 1920 AD 530 have historically been loathe to look behind the corporate veil, unless some form of abuse of the juristic personality has been perpetrated. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: Pinard-Byrne v Linton, heard 22 April 2015 (Judicial Committee of the Privy Council). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Oona A. Hathaway
The United States in its Article 51 letter notifying the Security Council of its self-defense operations in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks indicated that it was responding to the “ongoing threat . . . [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Jones involves a question that is common in the class-action context: What happens when it’s not practical for the defendant to pay every member of the class? [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:10 pm by Paul R. Verkuil
Natural Resources Defense Council, the case that was to recalibrate judicial review of agency decisions. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And it is not an impasse which can be resolved by the so-called “national sovereignty clause” any more than it has been settled by the clash of titans in the series of cases dealing with this point, directly or indirectly – Factortame ((No 1) [1990] 2 AC 85; Factortame (No 2) [1991] 1 AC 603), Thoburn v Sunderland City Council[2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) , Jackson v Attorney General [2006] 1 AC 262. [read post]