Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth" Results 801 - 820 of 1,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by Paul A. Prados
" p. 104.On the issue of activity v. inactivity: "[T]he Supreme Court has always described the commerce power as operating on already existing or ongoing activity. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Anthony in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This book does not merely address the conflicts between Commonwealth and State laws resolved by the Constitution (although it does that and in detail). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Ken Lammers
It places judges in trial courts with the knowledge that they have this power because the General Assembly has not stripped this power from judges through a general law. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
Commonwealth Edison Co., No. 110166-- Does a complaint seeking both injunctive relief and damages in connection with defendant’s alleged failure to timely restore power after storms, and to give priority in restoring power to customers dependent on electric life support system, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Illinois Commerce Commission? [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
In The Commonwealth v Sterling Nicholas Duty Free [1972] HCA 19; (1972) 126 CLR 297 at 305 Barwick CJ said: The jurisdiction to make a declaratory order without consequential relief is a large and most useful jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Paul A. Prados
  Essentially, if a case involves interpretation or enforcement of Federal law, which includes the Federal Constitution, the Commonwealth of Virginia has the power to remove the case from state court into Federal Court.On Friday April 22, the Commonwealth of Virginia removed such a case from the Circuit Court for Hanover County to the U.S. [read post]
Reason and justice prevailed this week in Massachusetts, where the Commonwealth’s highest court ruled by a 5-1 margin in Commonwealth v. [read post]