Search for: "Precision Medical, Inc."
Results 801 - 820
of 866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 9:07 am
Protection Plus, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:06 am
For the next four weeks, that calendar looks precisely like this: On Monday, the Court is scheduled to hold a private conference. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:03 pm
If a product requires modern technology and precise engineering, chances are, China needs it. [read post]
28 May 2008, 8:39 am
Gunderson, Inc., No. 07-0817. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (IPBiz) Global - Copyright Musopen puts classical recordings, scores in public domain: (Ars Technica) Events 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New York / San Francisco:… [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:08 am
ChartOne, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Apotex Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 927848, at *12-13, 15-16 (3d Cir. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2006 WL 2819046, at *3 (D.N.J. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 am
:The BMI works well for research purposes, but doesn’t necessarily translate precisely to the individual. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
., INC. et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
" 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
That is, we defend drug (and medical device) companies, not food companies. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
We've seen twice before what happens when plaintiffs start to get squeezed by preemption - during the initial flowering of the preemption defense in medical device cases that was snuffed out by Medtronic v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 11:49 am
(Set for April 2, 2008) (Set for April 2, 2008) COA Opinion This medical-malpractice case involves a question left open in today’s decision in Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Kia Motors AM., Inc., 357 F.3d 392 (3d Cir. 2004), and Morgan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Kia Motors AM., Inc., 357 F.3d 392 (3d Cir. 2004), and Morgan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
You decide to change the regulation itself to say precisely what you meant it to say all along, that's what. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:06 am
American Multimedia, Inc., ___ S.E.2d ___, 2007 WL 4386334 (N.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
Precisely because it's a broad argument, we'd like it to be the rationale that prevails. [read post]
