Search for: "Prince v State"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
What harmony” Disharmony extends to one third of the Data Protection Regulation” – pointing out the degree of disagreement between Member States prior to the meeting. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:58 pm
Superior Court (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 1, 5; see also Prince v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
Mayo v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:08 am
Edward Alder of Prince’s Chambers in relation to the appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In reliance on the minority position in Potash, the respondents pointed to the Nilsson decision (Nilsson v The University of Prince Edward Island) of a Human Rights Panel appointed under Prince Edward Island’s Human Rights Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
A 19th century idea first articulated in Prince v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Forthcoming Appeals A number of data protection cases will be the subject of appeal hearings in 2018: TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department – hearing 11 or 12 April 2018 Stunt v Associated Newspapers – hearing on 19 or 20 June 2018. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
He took care to confirm that a “would-be fair user of another’s work must have justification for the taking” (emphasis added). 3See What did Google Books Decision do to Cariou v Prince for a discussion of Leval’s focus on justification. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
INS v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
” (Ghazaryan, supra, 169 Cal.App.4th at p. 1536, 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 518; see also Prince v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Cir. 528, 533-34 (Newport News Dec. 18, 1996); Prince v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:23 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Justices to Consider Whether Warhol Image is “Fair Use” of Photograph of Prince First off today, Ronald Mann at SCOTUSblog reports that, tomorrow, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is expected to hear arguments in the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
Prince Harry was awarded £140,600 in damages to compensate him for the distressed he suffered as a result of the phone hacking. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:32 am
Sarah Grant summarized the military commission proceedings at the Nov. 7 hearing in U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* BREAKING: CJEU says that fair compensation for private copying cannot be funded through general state budgetThe CJEU has considered the freedom of implementing the private copying exception, which may be broad but not so broad as to allow for fair compensation to be funded from the general state budget. [read post]
