Search for: "Pure Precision Limited" Results 801 - 820 of 1,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Note that my recap does not reflect all Qs because I was participating. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Michael Cannan
He knows how to precisely document accident scene information, driver and witness statements, and verifiable facts. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:55 pm
And so I guess what I'm worried about is . . . we'll suddenly see people testing limits all over the place in high schools . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Brian Tamanaha
We recognize examples of “law” in alien civilizations precisely because they are human practices in alien drag. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
  In the course of his submissions her counsel, Professor Prinz, stated that these cases had been selected precisely because they were very similar to the first Von Hannover case. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
We gave you our quickie analysis of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
What the precise legal rationale would be is something I'm not sure of, is something on which research must be done. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Far from being predictable, this means that guessing how the ITC interprets the DMCA is pure speculation. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Not just removal of content as w/© infringement but decisions about violations that aren’t based on legality but are purely contractual—FB and breastfeeding images; suspending individual users. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
  (See KSM: “[W]hether infringement should be adjudicated in contempt proceedings, is difficult to articulate with precision, since it involves, to a large extent, the exercise of judicial discretion. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Although claim construction is not a purely legal matter, the Supreme Court found "sufficient reason to treat construction of terms of art like many other responsibilities that we cede to a judge in the normal course of trial, notwithstanding its evidentiary underpinnings. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The present decision is extremely interesting because it tries to shed some light on the - complex, to say the least - interrelation between G 1/03 and G 2/10.If you only want the headnote, here it is:The test of G 2/10 also applies to an amendment involving an undisclosed disclaimer by means of which a claim has been rendered new over a European patent application according to A 54(3). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
FILE – Kody Brown, center, poses with his wives, from left, Janelle, Christine, Meri and Robyn in a promotional photo for TLC’s reality TV show, “Sister Wives. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:32 am by Quinta Jurecic
It isn’t the way an effective white nationalist would make policy or undermine the courts or keep the nation pure of Muslims. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Given the pleading standard, dismissal at this stage was not warranted, even though defendants might well be right that many elements of the underlying websites were purely functional and/or factual and are not entitled to copyright protection. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  This is often treated purely as a matter of the requirements imposed by Article V and the number of amendments – twenty-seven since 1789, or, if you like, just fifteen since the early republic. [read post]
The earthquake took place yesterday, but today’s aftershocks continued to rock the Trump presidency. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Jane Chong
  Myth 1: Impeachment Is a Purely Political Determination. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
So what precisely is the question on which Judge Nichols differs from his colleagues? [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Recharacterized after Warhol: should not be significantly limited. [read post]