Search for: "RUSSELL v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 2,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
They relied upon the Court of Appeal authority of Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336 and the first instance decision in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135, which established that where a cause of action accrues part way through a day, that day should be excluded for limitation purposes. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  On Thursday, April 18, the Court's decision in Russell v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am by Marissa Miller
  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as co-counsel to the petitioners in City of Arlington v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Keisha Russell weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]