Search for: "Reed v. Mai"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
District Court Judge Edward Reed reversed, People v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:56 am
Kaufmann, 680 F.Supp. 658, 661 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (registration approach).See Mays & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:32 am
In Reed v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:45 am
The court's ruling last week in Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:47 pm
Hanna and Mrowka v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:54 am
Lee v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm
A website that satisfies one court may not satisfy another, and a business that settles a lawsuit today may be sued tomorrow over the same website. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
Hollywood Fan Sites http://t.co/jVTHir4I0c -> RT @SocialMediaLaw1: Social media told to simplify terms http://t.co/AE3xjluiRx -> RT @mgeist: Euro Parliament sends Canada – EU Agt on Passenger Name Record Data to the EU Court of Justice for review http://t.co/dZrnolWuR4 -> Netflix CEO Reed Hastings says broadcast TV will be dead by 2030 http://t.co/jO2cV7YorQ -> Telus and Bell face class-action lawsuits over per-minute billing practice http://t.co/epHRtmFjwB -> Social… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Big v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
On a sunny Friday afternoon, we have multiple posts on a case that may seem a bit silly to some. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
Kerrigan is a partner resident in the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Owens v Owens, heard 17 May 2018. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Becerra 16-1146 Issues: (1) Whether a determination that a law is content-based leaves room for a court to apply something less than strict scrutiny, specifically (a) whether the court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:02 am
May 13, 2009)Affirming that multiple claims, including discrimination, are barred by res judicata> Reed v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
