Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 801 - 820 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 14-593, also picks up a second relist since the state’s response arrived. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Ian M. Kysel
The pervasive realities of racial inequality remain a part of daily life for millions in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:01 am by Jacob Levin
” For the federal lease track, the opinion noted several claims in the memorandum that, according to the committee, require insight into the president’s documents, such as a pending bill that “would prohibit contracts between the United States … and the President. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Circuit threw out the order, holding that the transactions involve retail markets, where states have exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:03 pm
Instead, the court of appeals relied on the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am by Wells C. Bennett
Suleiman’s Opening Brief Suleiman’s Opening Brief begins with two broadsides against the Government’s detention power to hold a detainee like Suleiman, an alleged member of the Taliban who did not engage in hostilities against the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
The Office of the Solicitor General of the United States cited the article in its Bruen brief, regarding the University of Virginia's 1824 ban on firearms for students. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
The Director dismissed the charge as amended as against both respondents inasmuch as it appeared untimely, was devoid of facts to arguably establish a violation and was in some respects beyond PERB's jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
However, as she explains in her recap of that argument the following day, the fate of the appeal appears to hinge on the interpretation of the term “United States” as it appears in the Military Commissions Act’s jurisdiction-stripping provision. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This comment continues a pattern of behavior that led to our first public reprimand of Judge Kwan, following his in-court reference to sexual conduct and a former president of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:00 pm by Bob Bauer
”  He affirmed that the United States was a “great country” because “we share the same values of respect and dignity and human worth. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Alvin Y.H. Cheung
Congress that the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act should be reviewed. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
-EV] … After completion of briefing in this court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed the federal district court's grant of summary judgment [in Doe's parallel federal case], holding that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on John's Title IX claim against DU. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also stated that the Respondent was at least partially responsible for the delay in this case based on its shifting posture on the supervisory status issue. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
The provision empowers the president to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” if he “finds” that entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
But I suspect that even if a grant is in the offing, this case won’t be the vehicle, at least not yet: The respondent (the United States) waived its right to file a brief in opposition, and the court doesn’t ordinarily grant without at least calling for a response. [read post]