Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Next, if the court’s jurisdiction is limited to U.S. citizens, there is the question of exactly what the court is to decide. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 10:09 am
As Steve noted on Tuesday, the government petitioned for rehearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:26 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:59 pm
It does so presumably because of great confidence in its position, which consists roughly of two claims: one, that the defense bears the burden of proof, and thus far has offered no evidence that, in fact, attorney-client conversations are being monitored or recorded; and second, that, in the words of the prosecutors’ brief, “[n]o entity of the United States Government is listening, monitoring or recording communications between the five Accused and… [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:38 pm
Aunt signed an agreement assuming responsibility for C.P. and stating that C.P. would live with her indefinitely in her home in Vermont. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 2:57 pm
So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world. . . . [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am
United States), in which the Court will consider whether there an Apprendi right to jury trial for mandatory minimum sentencing facts. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Now that the country will resume its path to deliberate degradation and decay, it is time to return for a look at the parallel path which the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) is taking. [read post]
