Search for: "Russell v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
United States, in which the Court held that the federal bank robbery statute’s “forced accompaniment” provision applies whenever a bank robber forces someone to go somewhere with him, even for a short distance. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:55 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Mach Mining v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:38 am
Background ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.thenation.com A United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW) Local 770 Union Shop sticker. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
United States 14-310Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether, having invalidated the only mechanism the IRS had developed for pursuing refunds of long distance telephone excise taxes unlawfully exacted from individuals, corporations, and non-profit entities between February 28, 2003 and July 31, 2006, the District Court was nevertheless… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
United States 14-282Issue: Whether conspiracy to commit a robbery, absent any overt act in furtherance of the crime, is itself a violent felony presenting a serious potential risk of physical injury justifying an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:28 am
Gelboim v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
This week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Elonis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
In re Ryan 14-375Issue: Whether this Court should issue a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition ordering the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to issue the mandate in Henry v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
United States, in which Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement regarding the denial. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
United States, in which the Court had been asked to consider a challenge to an insider trading conviction. [read post]
