Search for: "S S
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 11:43 am
(Court's Holding) ( Article) In its analysis the Kentucky high court referenced the Indiana Supreme Court's holding in State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
(Court's Holding) ( Article) In its analysis of the case the Kentucky Court also referenced the Indiana Supreme Court's holding in State v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:12 am
Supreme Court in Indiana v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:21 am
In Indiana, the case of Michael Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:17 am
August was a busy month for Indiana IP litigators. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:43 am
In the subject of this blog, Miller v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:32 pm
While most of Uniloc’s lawsuits have been filed in the patent-infringement-plaintiff-friendly State of Texas, the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in the TC Heartland case limits the venues for patent infringement cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:58 pm
In Roderick Lee v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the State of Indiana, which triggered the plaintiff’s right to bring a contribution claim, but that the statute of limitations on the plaintiff’s contribution claim had run. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:12 pm
In Nat'l Athletic Sportswear v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Indiana Dept. of Corrections, an 8-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:Roy Smith, pro se, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his complaint against the Indiana Department of Correction ("DOC"), the Indiana State Prison ("ISP"), the State of Indiana, and several employees of ISP, after conducting the inquiry required by Indiana Code chapter 34-58-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Burwell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Dennis Day v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm
In ordering the transfer, Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois stated, "After a careful review of the Defendants' pending motion to transfer and Plaintiff's response thereto, the pending motion to transfer is granted for the reasons outlined by Judge William Hart in the related case of Hudson v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:42 pm
We conclude that under Indiana's new "advisory" sentencing scheme, such use of a prior conviction does not amount to an impermissible double enhancement. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
” Monster Trash, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
That’s right: Texas and Missouri specifically protect civil rights laws in their state RFRAs. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
(mother) v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
First, the Indiana case: In Halfhill v. [read post]
