Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 21,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 12:48 pm
RC3, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:09 am
On February 14, 2011, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District of Arizona’s ruling in Christopher, et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
See Koenigsberg v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Sales, Inc., 2008 WL 111223 (N.D. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
Carroca v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
Editions authorized for sale in the United States are of the highest quality, and are printed with strong, hard-cover bindings with glossy protective coatings. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
BOBS-MERRILL v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
This case involves the Fair Housing Act, which states that it is illegal to "refuse to sell or rent...or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
In Scanlon v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:56 am
Discussing the issue, the court stated: “The issue before the Court is whether “gross volume of sales made or business done” as used in 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
The Ninth Circuit also, however, remanded the case for a further determination as to whether Fiat Chrysler had adequately disclosed its relationship with, and qualifications to use, Bluetooth technology, as it was required to do under limits previously placed on the first sale doctrine (Bluetooth SIG Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
In Great Lakes Bar Control v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:43 am
Maffick LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Range v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
The post Business Law: Letters of Intents v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 6:16 am
Fanning.It granted Pat Dunn's PR in State v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:00 am
., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
