Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 4,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Knowing what you know now about the United States’s use of waterboarding and other coercive methods against detainees, do you still believe that the United States did not torture? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Livermore
United States, in which a separate opinion by Kennedy avoided a majority opinion by Scalia that would have severely limited the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
Kavanaugh’s views on that subject can best be inferred from an opinion he wrote shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
McIntyre Machinery employed a distributor to sell its machines in the United States, including New Jersey. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:40 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Section 455 which provides: (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
" (Quoting Justice Scalia's concurrence in McDonald). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
(After that case, I suggested a law Congress could pass to address Scalia’s concerns while continuing to limit state tax overreaching.) [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (1999), but says it has been undercut by Murphy v. [read post]