Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
The justices won't be writing on a clean slate. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:53 am
Abbott and Morris v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm
Lagos v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:49 pm
It relies heavily on the writing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who aided opponents of gerrymandering in a crucial but often overlooked 2015 opinion…In 2015, however, Ginsburg seized upon a tangential case, Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
State Water Resources Control Board (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 991; see 10/11/17 post. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
” And, obviously, it is not in the interests of the United States to flip its views every time a particular Solicitor General happens to personally think that the prevailing U.S. position is not the one he would have arrived at on a clean slate. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
” And, obviously, it is not in the interests of the United States to flip its views every time a particular Solicitor General happens to personally think that the prevailing U.S. position is not the one he would have arrived at on a clean slate. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:45 pm
v=yWP6Qki8mWc * Yup, this is how the President of the United States used his Twitter account in 2017. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:43 am
“The board well understood that the deal had been struck,” the court stated. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Their ruling could have ripple effects well beyond California: As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have observed at Slate, over a dozen states have laws that are intended to discourage women from having abortions by requiring abortion providers to tell their patients, for example, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer or that abortion increases the risk of suicide. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am
” But Burdick v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 8:27 am
"Neil Gorsuch's Independent Streak: At arguments in Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
At Slate, Eric Segall explains why, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
