Search for: "Smart v State"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
State of Okl, ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:03 pm
Tactically, it's probably not smart to call the principal a "fucker," a "fag," and a "fucking fag. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:48 pm
”) Webb v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
State of Okl, ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:32 am
CharityNav: Five Charity Myths Dispelled http://ht.ly/1ZNZE CynthiaRRowland: Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:10 am
Leathermon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
But the union had convinced the district court that Sec. 303 was one of the rare instances of “complete preemption,” and thus removal was proper, relying on the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning in Smart v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
I find Justice Scalia to be too smart (or perhaps, too glib is a better choice of words) for his or the nation's good. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:41 pm
LaCalle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
In my previous post, I explored the extent to which the Munaf v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
In 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
Judge Richard Linn in Smart Systems Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Note that many of these questions could be empirically studied, and the results of those empirical studies could inform smart policy resolutions. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* BREAKING: CJEU says that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive but Member States can protect themHere's another insightful take by Eleonora on the surreal CJEU decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment, a reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly hyperlink-loving Member State, Sweden, which was supposed to address linking and copyright. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
See People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm
” Shatto v. [read post]
