Search for: "Smith v. Field"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Thorpe, Way out in left field: Crespin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
News Liberal Democrat MPs continue their parliamentary activity in the field of media law. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
Case in point is the recent decision of Leslie v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Smith and G. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
The new case is J.D.B. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
Specifically, they refer to the case Johnston v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In Brady v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
Secretary of State for Defence, and Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 am
To this, Mary Ellen Field adds some highly pertinent comments of her own: "It is very sad that there was little input from SMEs at the meeting last week, but not at all surprising. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Smith of Orlando, Florida, is no admirer of the patent system. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 10:48 am
Oral Argument in case# 10-2339; Andrea Fields v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
It is therefore with some interest that this particular Kat read the Court of Appeal’s judgment in JIH v News Group Newspapers [2011] EWCA Civ 42 (the Master of the Rolls providing a judgment with which Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Lady Justice Smith agreed), handed down yesterday. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
