Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 11,004
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:49 am
LLC,MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, AND MORGAN STANLEY, Defendants. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:24 am by Ilya Somin
Smith, a 2009 Supreme Court case that was ultimately dismissed as moot after the state and the property owners reached a settlement. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting item from Judge Theodore Chuang's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]