Search for: "Smith v. State of Texas"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
Texas. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:19 pm
Leading off this double edition is the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Ex Parte Roy Gene Smith. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
After the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Marshall jousted most vigorously in federal bankruptcy court — he had won a ruling by a Texas state probate court awarding him his father’s estate. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:38 am
Texas. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Agency, Inc., 584 S.W.2d 860, 862 (Tex. 1979); Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:48 pm
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:58 pm
Two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Sineneng-Smith, which the court decided in May. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Delaware: Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 4:57 pm
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:19 am
Smith became the most-relisted case of all time, the court finally disposed of it. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 8:23 am
The justices in the 1955 case of Watson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
