Search for: "Specter v. Specter"
Results 801 - 820
of 955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 8:58 am
The case of Luse v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
From Van Deelen v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Its decisions in Griggs v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:58 am
In Sevatec Holdings Inc. v Octo Platform Equity Holdings, LLC, C.A. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The account at issue in Madden v Midland involved an open-end credit card plan (aka credit card account) and the account was not sold by Bank of America to an unaffiliated national bank, contrary representation by the Curious authors notwithstanding. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:31 pm
Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The case of North Carolina v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
One key opinion is Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Dunn and McGrain v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:38 am
See POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
” State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
” In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
The specter of a conflict of interest appears any time a personal representative seeks to sell an estate asset to himself or engage in any other business transaction that could potentially benefit him at the expense of the beneficiaries of the estate. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:15 pm
For poor women, this often meant that their pregnancies—the types of foods they could afford to eat, as well as their healthcare from pregnancy to birth—took place under the specter of criminal law. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
Suffice it to say that this case raises the specter of full-blown corporatism overtaking the entire U.S. economic and social system. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
By way of a reminder, however, to obtain a preliminary injunction, Louboutin must have established (1) irreparable harm and (2) either (a) likelihood of success on the merits, or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits of its claims to make them fair ground for litigation, plus a balance of the hardships tipping decidedly in [its favor] (Monserrate v New York State Senate (2010)). [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
