Search for: "Specter v. Specter" Results 801 - 820 of 955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2009, 10:37 pm
' So, before the sunwas down, we had the rule that is now Rule 10b-5.Today the W$J Blog is reporting that Senators Arlen Specter, Jack Reed, and Edward Kaufman are sponsoring a bill to upend the Supreme Court's 2007 opinion in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:23 am
When Congressman Joe Sestak announced this morning that he would challenge not-a-Republican Arlen Specter, liberal hearts across the Keystone State soared. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
Employment law experts have been paying close attention to how federal courts are interpreting the 2009 Supreme Court case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:23 pm
The Congressional Record reports that Senator Arlen Specter yesterday offered a bill. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 3:40 pm
Arlen Specter (D-PA) filed legislation Wednesday designed to return the standard to what it was prior to 2007, when the court handed down its Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 3:05 pm
Arlen Specter (D-Pa) has proposed a return to prior pleading standards for civil lawsuits. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
by Brian Wolfman Senator Arlen Specter has just introduced this bill to reestablish the notice-pleading standards of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8 as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Conley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
On Wednesday, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania introduced a bill to return pleading standards in United States federal courts  back to  the “standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:39 pm
Arlen Specter this week will introduce the Notice Pleading Restoration Act to overturn Twombly and Iqbal and reinstate Conley v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
Over 20 years ago, Joe Biden and Arlen Specter bested Robert Bork at his own game. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Highlights will include Arlen Specter (who is used to speaking a lot earlier at these confirmation hearings) and the newest U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:01 am
(Controversially (prior IntLawGrrls post), many of the other judges have been kept anonymous, putatively for their safety, raising the specter of faceless judges presiding over star chambers. [read post]