Search for: "Spencer v Spencer" Results 801 - 820 of 1,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
.: From the Constitution to Today http://t.co/DSSvBgPgAf -> Iggy Azalea Slaps Ex-Boyfriend with Copyright Infringement and Forgery Lawsuits http://t.co/HfKzy2KvkP -> MPAA Chairman & CEO Chris Dodd Calls For Focus On Creativity and Content Protection at WIPO http://t.co/lwTrhFY6LN -> STATEMENT OF SANDRA AISTARS, CEO, COPYRIGHT ALLIANCE BEFORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ON TPMS http://t.co/vgxvpo6k4A -> TVShack Founder Extradited to US for Alleged Copyright Infringement… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Ashby Jones
Part of the interest in Canada among U.S. lawyers — who are watching Milberg’s move closely — follows the 2010 Morrison v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 5:01 pm
" The leading case in Pennsylvania on the enforceability of pre-nuptial agreements is Simeone v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:28 pm by Eric Turkewitz
But don’t take my word for it, as this is what federal judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. said about it in Alexander v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Justin Tenuto
” Related articles Privacy Advocates Ask Feds to Stop Facebook Facial Recognition (pcworld.com) Lane et al v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Ben Nelson (PDF 644 KB)Letters Regarding the Location for the New Global Strike Command04/03/2009 Notice: Build America Bonds and Direct Payment Subsidy Implementation (PDF 40 KB)Released by the Internal Revenue Service04/03/2009 Opinion in the Matter of Katherine Varnum, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
It may betray personal information long before a Spencer warrant is sought. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
  These cases arise out the dicta handed down in the Spencer v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
* Unauthorized Use of Photograph to Create Fake Dating Profile Not a Violation of Lanham ActMarie-Andrée reports on Yuliana Avalos v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Judge Katzmann distinguished both Google France SARL v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and Interflora Inc and Anor v Marks & Spencer, determining that the wording used in the EU legislation was not an equivalent to the Australian wording, especially with the difference in 'using in the course of trade' (per Article 5 of the first Trade Mark Directive) and 'used as a trademark' under section 120 of the Australian Act. [read post]