Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
Somehow, the Second Circuit managed to analogize allowing jurors, unsupervised and with full access to family and friends, to study the prosecution's template of the case at home to permitting jurors to take home copies of their jury instructions, for which there is precedential support. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
Somehow, the Second Circuit managed to analogize allowing jurors, unsupervised and with full access to family and friends, to study the prosecution's template of the case at home to permitting jurors to take home copies of their jury instructions, for which there is precedential support. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:58 pm
The court denied the motion indicating that it would instruct the jury as to the appropriate use of the witness’ testimony, as it had done after the witness' testimony. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
We don’t know but it is likely that this expert was instructed jointly by all the parties rather than having separate “defence” and “prosecution” witnesses as in criminal cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:40 am
One problem was the jury instructions: they were led to believe that, in order to impose a life sentence, they would have to unanimously agree that the mitigating circumstances outweighed the aggravating circumstances. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Officer Levi Miller investigated the case. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
This summary will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
The case is the cross-petition in the Reginald Carr case above (14-450), in which the petitioner asks whether a “jury view” of locations relevant to a criminal case is a critical stage of a criminal trial requiring the presence of a defendant and assistance of counsel. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
In a criminal case, the Crown may not argue that any evidence pointing towards the accused’s guilt provides relevant context. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:17 am
The only viable option for the committee in that case would be a criminal contempt certification by the House to the Justice Department. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:24 pm
Still not sure why the case got moved up to the first of the month. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
In that case, the Superior Court reviewed the history of the error in judgment rule and held that it was no longer valid in Pennsylvania due to its inconsistency with the "standard of care" analysis utilized in medical malpractice cases. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:32 am
The Florida Standard Jury Instructions define a "public place" as: "any place intended or designed to be frequented or resorted to by the public. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:15 am
Criminal case. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
This is freakin' major case in criminal and tax practice. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Neither police violation of an established obligation nor a denial of due process are prerequisites for a proper adverse inference charge - those criteria apply to the abuse of discretion standard applicable to the appellate court's consideration of the lower court's refusal to give such an instruction; i.e., if the police refusal to record defendant's interrogation violated defendant's due process rights, it would have been an abuse of discretion for the trial… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am
Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions 8.01 (“When fraudulent intent is an element of the crime, the prosecution has the burden of proving such intent beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The majority concluded that the state did present sufficient evidence under this standard, but remanded the case for a new trial to allow “a properly instructed jury” to decide the case. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Kentucky in concluding that petitioner had not presented a prima facie case of race discrimination with respect to jury selection at her criminal trial in state court. . [read post]
