Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 801 - 820
of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
California, 505 U.S. 437, 439 (1992); see State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
The Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk Superior Court in Massachusetts recently analyzed these issues in a pair of cases involving the application of California law to cases and agreements outside of the state. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:09 pm
Back in December, I posted about the Court of Appeals decision in Sony Electronics v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:57 pm
The California Supreme Court states the answer to both questions is "no. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:24 pm
But that language is in no way as categorically dispositive as the Court of Appeal frames it.Imagine, for example, that Wisconsin has the exact same statute as California. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
” [Opinion at pp. 8-9] Relying on the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rupert A. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
Superior Court, 169 Cal. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
California State Lottery Comm., (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1739, 1744; Sandoval v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Superior Court (Krescent), S199384). [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
Brown Jr. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:13 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Superior Court, 165 Cal. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Who do you think is right in this one; the trial court or the Court of Appeal? [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:40 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:47 am
Superior Court have important implications for California retailers opposing class certification. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:56 am
App. 4th ____ (2007), a California court of appeal reversed a superior court’s grant of summary judgment on the plaintiff’s age discrimination claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:12 pm
Albertson's, Inc., San Diego County Superior Court case no. [read post]
