Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:41 pm
In Yahoo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Michael Mongan, the California Solicitor General, represented the state, while Jeffrey Lamken represented the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2024, 2:33 pm
Seth has represented a broad range of clients in complex business disputes in various state and federal courts, and he has argued numerous matters before California appellate courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
With this decision, accompanied by the defeat of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:43 am
Von Saher v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
There are millions of immigrants arriving in the United States each year, and many of these people choose to come to California. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
As Bill noted Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
The Court's decisions in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm
United States District Court Judge Ronald M. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
On December 15, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Heien v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Beard v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:36 pm
United States on 12/3/15. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm
Plaintiffs pled the above claims in a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:30 pm
On April 3, the CAFC held that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the district court) erred in refusing to remand a case to California state court where removal to a district court was improper under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:33 am
The Bottom Line: Enforcing arbitration agreements continues to be hampered by uncertainty in California despite seemingly definitive rulings from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
