Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 13,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm by Florian Mueller
Once the FTC pursues a PI against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard, it will have a hard time persuading a federal judge of its market and product category definitions.Based on the FTC's market definition, Judge Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California "Court finds that—regardless of the metrics used—every one of these ratios reflect a market concentration well above what the Merger Guidelines have designated as… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by John A. Emmons
Quinta Jurecic analyzed the California State Bar’s recent disciplinary action against attorney and Trump ally John Eastman. [read post]
Code, § 66000 et seq.) and the takings clause of the United States Constitution, namely the special application of the “unconstitutional conditions doctrine” in the context of land use exactions established in Nollan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
Cal.) jury trial in San Francisco for November 6, 2023.This means the trial will be interrupted by the Thanksgiving holiday (November 23), though it is unclear whether the trial will be interrupted for a full week or just a very long weekend.As previously reported, Google already has a huge antitrust trial coming up in the last third of this year: on September 12, the United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]