Search for: "State v Ring" Results 801 - 820 of 1,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
If that rings a bell for you, it’s either tinnitus or because the Court already invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:51 am by Walter Olson
In 1987, Federal judge Christine Cook Nettesheim accurately characterized the initial 1973 asbestos case, Borel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The Journal takes a look inside Europe’s migrant smuggling rings, which in order to profit from the current migration crisis, have adapted from existing criminal networks once known for smuggling guns and drugs. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:54 am by Cooper Quintin and Dave Maass
  A Brief History of ALPR Vulnerability Research  A few years ago, security researchers began to ring the alarm over what they originally misidentified as hundreds of red-light cameras that were connected to the Internet without any security measures in place. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:48 pm
Gene Robinson received a miter and ring in 2003. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
You can read more about the burglary ring and the prosecution in the stories you can find here and here. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
@benjaminwittes in a ring, both shirtless, would be something to see. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:00 pm
 Winsor- the attorney arguing for Florida, admitted that such a result was both authorized by Florida law and violated Ring v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:45 am by David Markus
At some points, it appeared that the state’s lawyer was making at least some concessions that part of the system would not satisfy the Ring precedent. [read post]