Search for: "State v. Arnold" Results 801 - 820 of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
 * Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In response, the engineers not only defended the appeal but issued proceedings for breach of contract and sought summary judgment.Mr Justice Arnold, giving summary judgment in favour of the engineers, dismissed the watchmaker's appeal. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:06 am
Recently, Justice Arnold in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch) held that 8 second cricket clips infringed copyright in broadcasts of matches, discussed here in a Kat post.Agon also stated that rival website Chessbomb had created an app that allowed spectators of live matches to leak the moves. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
  This is assuming that the mark’s distinctiveness is a live issue, and bearing in mind that the court’s consideration of this issue might depend on the particular s 3(1)/7(1) subsection it deems to be enlivened.In Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch) at [40]-[45],Arnold J outlined the general principles involved in assessing distinctiveness, stressing the broad nature of this inquiry. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:57 am by emagraken
This concept was explained by Arnold-Bailey J. in Biehl v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
In my judgment Mr Arnold fell into error in characterising the registration of marks in a series in the way that he did. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone stated that the city’s ban could violate the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Corrections Secretary Matt Cate "essentially have told the court that they will reduce the state prison population as the state sees fit, to a level the state deems appropriate, and in a time frame the state has set for itself," the attorneys wrote. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Velazquez, etc., appellant, v Bruno Decaudin, et al., defendants, Arnold Streisfeld, etc., et al., respondents. [read post]