Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 801 - 820 of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2015, 11:02 am by Giles Peaker
But short, the UT found that the FTT in this case was wrong to uphold a ‘separated family’ appeal on the basis that Reg B13 was not affected by the decision in R v Housing Benefit Review Board for Swale Borough Council, ex party Marchant. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poole Borough Council v GN (through his litigation friend, ‘The Official Solicitor’) & Anor, heard 16-17 Jul 2018. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
GuarnieriDocket: 09-1476Issue(s): Whether state and local government employees may sue their employers for retaliation under the First Amendment’s Petition Clause when they petitioned the government on matters of private concern.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Title: Madison County v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 11:59 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A recent case (not a housing case though) where rectification was ordered is Borough of Milton Keynes -v- Viridor (Community Recycling MK) Limited (No 2) [2017] (discussed here). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
Poplar was created for the purpose of taking over part of the housing stock of the borough of Tower Hamlets […] Mr  Brockway states that as a matter of policy the Corporation has always asked RSLs to grant the most secure form of tenure available to its tenants. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Shoesmith, R (on the application of) v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642 (27 May 2011) – Read judgment In April 2005, Sharon Shoesmith was appointed as Director of Children’s Services at Haringey London Borough Council. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am by Michael DeRose
Both PERC and the appeals court relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Borough of Keyport v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
There were three “damages only” trials Undre v London Borough of Harrow (No.2) [2016] EWHC 2761 (QB) (Sir David Eady) – damages of £9,000 were awarded after the acceptance of an offer of amends. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council [2014] EWHC 85 (Admin) Ms Trafford set up her personal injury practice in Blackpool in 2008. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council [2014] EWHC 85 (Admin) Ms Trafford set up her personal injury practice in Blackpool in 2008. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See CPLR 3211[a][7]" "In Community Board 7 of the Borough of Manhattan v Schaffer (84 NY2d 148 [1994]), the Court of Appeals discussed the distinction between dismissal for lack of capacity, lack of standing, and for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]