Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
V. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mousa, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1334 (22 November 2011) Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314 (22 November 2011) London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1356 (22 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) AS v London Borough of Croydon [2011] EWHC 2091 (Admin) (25 October 2011) High Court (Chancery Division)… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:05 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HM Revenue & Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1323 (18 November 2011) San Michael College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1336 (18 November 2011) Bethell Construction Ltd & Anor v Deloitte and Touche [2011] EWCA Civ 1321 (18 November 2011) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1333 (18 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Medhanye, R… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:22 am
The problem with the AWR is that it doesn’t resolve the issue, highlighted in cases like Dacas v Brook Street and James v Greenwich Borough Council, of whom the worker should sue in the event that they feel they have been unfairly dismissed. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Finsbury Borough Council. [1952] A.C. 109/132. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:40 am
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Angola) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1238 (01 November 2011) Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249 (01 November 2011) Williams v University… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Borough of Pine Hill, 189 N.J. 497, 520 (2007) (quoting State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:38 pm
Ciaglia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:34 pm
In Heller v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
The claimant must show at least a "strong prima facie case" and the balance of convenience test in American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon [1975] AC 396, does not apply, see Francis v The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2003] EWCA Civ 443-paragraph 16. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
The claimant must show at least a "strong prima facie case" and the balance of convenience test in American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon [1975] AC 396, does not apply, see Francis v The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2003] EWCA Civ 443-paragraph 16. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm
Updated | Bailey & Others v London Borough of Brent Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin) – Read judgment Every Wednesday my daughter looks forward to the arrival of the mobile library at her nursery. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
” Jaime Bouvier (Cleveland-Marshall Law) presents “Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
We have previously covered the changes to housing benefit (HB) introduced by the Con-Dems and the DCLG’s concerns over them as well as those of certain London boroughs. [read post]
