Search for: "State v. C. A."
Results 801 - 820
of 39,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
Prosecutors charged that a Texan, Justus C. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
But the list, under K.S.A. 22-4902(c)(4), only includes felony criminal sodomy as defined in K.S.A. 22-4902(a)(2) and (3), and omits the misdemeanor criminal sodomy for which Coman was convicted. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:13 pm
The Court of Justice dismissed an action brought by the Commission against the United Kingdom in Case C-127/05 Commission v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court's opinion in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:12 am
Panter v Rowellian Football Social Club and others [2011] EWHC 1301 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 170 “Paragraph 111(1A)(c) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986, as inserted, applied to companies which were incorporated in states outside the European Economic Area and it did not apply to entities that were not incorporated at all. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 10:55 am
(State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 4:49 am
Moore, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 6:55 am
US Department of State et. al, No. 07 C 3795 (N.D. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 2:39 am
Johnson (Columbia University Law School), The Story of Bob Jones University v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This week, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Elonis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Just a brief note on this case: Edgerly v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:42 am
C. 2254(d), federal habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state court has adjudicated on the merits unless, among other exceptions, the state-court decision denying relief involves “an unreasonable application” of “clearly established Federal law, as determined by” this Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
Co. of Canada v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:52 am
State, 331 Md. 179 (1993) and Gray v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:44 am
But Section IV(C) seems like an important section to focus on, not the one sentence about Terry stops.The post You Might Want to Read More Sentences of <i>Arizona v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
’” Time, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Volokh Conspiracy: My View of the Second Question Presented in United States v. [read post]
