Search for: "State v. Card" Results 801 - 820 of 5,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
The facts showed as follows: • The defendant entered the United States illegally • two years after his illegal reentry, he married a United States citizen • His wife filed an I-130, the first step for aliens seeking a green card • About 7 years after she filed the I-130, he was indicted for reentry after deportation. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
The facts showed as follows: • The defendant entered the United States illegally • two years after his illegal reentry, he married a United States citizen • His wife filed an I-130, the first step for aliens seeking a green card • About 7 years after she filed the I-130, he was indicted for reentry after deportation. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
The facts showed as follows: • The defendant entered the United States illegally • two years after his illegal reentry, he married a United States citizen • His wife filed an I-130, the first step for aliens seeking a green card • About 7 years after she filed the I-130, he was indicted for reentry after deportation. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by Daniel Murphy
  In order to conduct such transactions, among other things, the managing institution likely has to be licensed in some fashion under state law, the customer’s identity must be known, and the institution has to report the transaction. [read post]