Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 801 - 820
of 37,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2011, 1:13 am
Today marks five months from ACCA’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
Antokol's failure to establish grounds for divorce in defendant's favor, albeit clearly a point of frustration for defendant, was irrelevant, as fault did not affect the equitable distribution of marital assets (see Howard S. v Lillian S., 14 NY3d 431, 435-436 [2010]). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm
” Hines v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
A. v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 7:51 am
This case was decided a few years ago, but it was a major turning point in Georgia law on relocation: Bodne v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The trial court agreed with the remote sellers and granted a summary judgment in its favor. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
Until recently, there were two huge cases pending in Will County, the State of Illinois v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:05 am
United States -- about which IntLawGrrls have posted here and here -- is the first individual complaint by a victim of domestic violence to be brought against the United States for a failure to enforce a mandatory protective order.The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’ decision in favor of Ms. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Indeed, “[a]ny doubts as to the propriety of a federal injunction against state court proceedings should be resolved in favor of permitting the state courts to proceed. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:08 am
From a 6-5 en banc decision (though, more accurately, a 5-1-3-2, but with the top six in favor of one result and the bottom five in favor of the other) in which he's in the minority.Just to give you a tenor of the thing, here's his conclusion:"Today we become the only court in the country to hold that a state court may adjudicate a constitutional claim 'on the merits' by overlooking it, and then have its carelessness rewarded with AEDPA’s… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
Co-workers thought plaintiff was gay, and they ridiculed him over this and subjected him to obscene and lewd remarks.The case is Dingle v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:55 pm
The case, Green v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:48 am
Petitioner argued that the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:48 am
Hulu, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm
It's a legal theory that departs from the method of constitutional interpretation favored by a generation of conservative legal thinkers, originalism. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Before Goodridge v. [read post]
