Search for: "State v. Glass" Results 801 - 820 of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The pending appeal in Ruisech v Structure Tone Inc. concerns a construction site accident where the plaintiff, employed by A-Val (a subcontractor), slipped on pebbles while installing a glass divider. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
By the same token, the White Queen in Through the Looking Glass famously boasted she was able to believe "six impossible things before breakfast. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
  In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by smiplaw
General Excavator Co., 290 U.S. 240 (1933) 19 USPQ 228 (1933), Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hirsch Glass Co., 467 Fed.Appx. 651 (9th Cir. 2012) (coloring and color blends are uncopyrightable elements); Baby Buddies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:49 pm by Jason Noakes and Felicity Tighe
Safe Work New South Wales v Austral Hydroponics P/L; Safe Work New South Wales v Eang Lam [2015] NSWDC 295 Safe Work NSW  has brought a successful prosecution against a Company  Austral Hydroponics Pty Ltd (Austral Hydroponics) and its Director Mr Eang Lam (Mr Lam). [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court confirmed that regime in its 1957 decision in Fourco Glass v Transmirra Products. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Rancour, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: APA, FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Rancour, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: APA, FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Panel decisions in favor of criminal defendants are now sometimes corrected en banc, rather than going up to the Supreme Court to add to the Ninth's notorious reversal rate.One such decision was a fairly standard case on premeditation, United States v. [read post]