Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 801 - 820 of 23,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
Just last week in ACLU v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
” Governor Hutchison who signed the law stated his main impetus is to directly challenge Roe v Wade. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
  Take one of the landmark cases on concurrent cause theory, Partridge v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jim Singer
 In Mayo v, Prometheus (No. 10-1150, March 20, 2012), the Court held that U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by Michel-Adrien
" "Since the decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal in R v Campbell ([1997] 2 VR 585), an accused is reckless if they know that a particular harmful consequence will probably result from their action but they proceed regardless. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 am by Dianne Saxe
Jessica Yuan and Dianne Saxe Animal Welfare Institute, et al., v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Aimee Hess
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion last year in Waggoner v. [read post]