Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Collectively, if not individually, these destabilizing dynamics will alter the balance of power utterly between directors and activist stockholders, between federal and state regulators, between American and foreign sources of capital, and between models of consensus and contentious corporate governance. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Todd's paper first argues that paternalism for corporate employees is inevitable because stakeholders will demand it (e.g., to cut health care costs), then engages in a comparative analysis of who should supply it, markets or the state. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am
Supreme Court’s historic ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
The opinion includes a cautionary reflection on the limits of corporate law, at least the law of a single small state, as a lever for the pursuit of pro-social objectives. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
The SEC’s stated goals in instituting this proposal were to minimize instances of fraud perpetrated by hedge funds. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
As a result of this decision, several states began to enact corporate indemnification statutes.8 In 1967, the State of Delaware passed new indemnification laws specifically authorizing corporations to purchase D&O liability insurance; by 1973, 25 other states had followed Delaware’s lead.9 Until this time, it was unclear if a corporation could legally pay the cost of the individual liability of a director or officer under the… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm
First Na'tl Bank of Lake City, 81 So.2d 486 (Fla.1955), Nat'l Loan Investors, L.P. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:35 am
In King v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
In Dirks v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am
But corporate officials are not always entitled to indemnification. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration finalized a rulepermitting retirement plan fiduciaries to consider climate change and other ESG factors when selecting investments and exercising shareholder rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
’”[12] The court also explained that the plain text of Section 10(b) differs significantly from that of other provisions of the federal securities laws that do allow for a private action based solely on an Item 303 violation—namely, Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act, which address misstatements or omissions in registration statements and prospectuses.[13] Unlike Exchange Act Section 10(b), Securities Act Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) explicitly… [read post]
19 May 2012, 4:33 pm
Arbitration Clauses Federal Court Upholds Arbitration Clause In Mortenson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:51 am
Article 2 (Definitions) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows: 1.The term “real estate investment company” means any company that is incorporated pursuant to Article 5 mainly for the purpose of investing its assets in real estate and managing invested assets, which falls under each of the following items: (a) The self-managed real estate investment company: The company that has full-time officers and employees, including asset management specialists, on its… [read post]
