Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court case, Henson v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:36 pm
Mendoza v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
Lange sent Saunders a list of items, including a hard drive. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
The proper measure of restitution, when property has not been completely destroyed, is the value of the item before the damage less the value after the damage.Reversed and remanded.J. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:53 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:24 am
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 111 Idaho 891, 728 P.2d 780 (Ct. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am
United States (Federal Taxation) Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm
In Pollock v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am
Attorneys representing “commercial paleontologist” Eric Prokopi filed a motion to dismiss last Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:29 am
" Defendant's testimony was supported by the testimony of a customer of the auto shop, who heard the owner tell defendant that items left at the shop for a period exceeding 30 days became the property of the auto shop, as well as by the testimony of State Police investigators to whom defendant related that he had been told by the owner of the auto shop that the tires were not wanted. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
Vaughn v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
Uniroyal, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 5:25 pm
LEXIS 1511 (July 3, 2007): In One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
Bennis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:25 am
State - (Tex. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
I further stated that clause C the phrase, "which are the property of AGENT" modifies the property described in clause B. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:40 pm
However, they failed to persuade the district court that the items of personal property they listed as missing had existed or that Kimmel had disposed of them. [read post]
