Search for: "State v. Knight" Results 801 - 820 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
When these “dark knights of Wall Street,” as a recent Law360 Expert Analysis article called them, succeed in driving down a stock price, aggressive securities plaintiff attorneys heed the bat signal and litigate against the affected issuer when they may not have done so otherwise.[1] After all, the defendant company may not have publicly disclosed anything at the time when the activist short-seller decided to launch a faux-fraud campaign to profit from their short position. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
O'Brien: woman who delivers junk mail for a living  threatens to sue homeowner after getting her finger caught in his mail slot Knights Templar v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), but like the monster in a formula horror movie it springs back to life and attacks again. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:56 am by Tom Smith
Knight that, like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, trains and communication networks are privately owned yet the law obligates them to serve everyone. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:03 pm by Gordon Firemark
For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]” Or,  just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio SHOW NOTES Monkey Photographer – follow up http://copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/08/monkeys-selfie-cannot-be-copyrighted-us-regulators-say/ http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/a-mural-painted-by-an-726547… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]