Search for: "State v. Lien"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Federal Court Rules that Subcontractor Duties Are Not Terminated by Contractor’s Modest Underpayment
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm
Case at ButchKavitz, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 7:45 am
This 2006 case is styled, Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Court is stating that, much like the qualifying labor or materials under a mechanic’s lien, to qualify for Miller Act treatment, the “labor” must have been “incorporated” into the project in a way that is directly associated with the job duties of the claimant. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
Berry, 2 Ohio St.2d 169, 207 N.E.2d 545; Snyder v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:00 am
That's what happened in Wallace v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
” And, in any event, the buyer was found to have bargained for “’a title that was free and clear’ of liens,” and couldn’t recover real-estate tax over-payments made by the seller in the fiscal years which preceded the closing.You get what you pay for, folks ....# # #DECISION:69 Pinehurst LLC v Sixty Nine Pinehurst Ave. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
However, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
You can read the case in its entirety at: Tunick v Shaw [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
(See Rome Healthcare LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
(See Rome Healthcare LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
(See Rome Healthcare LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 3:11 pm
Common Law Claims Precluded by Construction Lien Statute Jax Utilities Management, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 3:11 pm
Common Law Claims Precluded by Construction Lien Statute Jax Utilities Management, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
Thereafter, the defendants moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:29 am
(Jarkesy v. [read post]
