Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 801 - 820
of 24,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
Holmes et. al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
” “In addition, this bill could further increase receipts to the State General Fund from civil penalties (ranging from $100 for a Class II violation up to $10,000 for a Class V violation), imposed on food sales establishments that violate the provisions of this bill. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
"Taxes for the "little people" are fairly straightforward, and you basically have to pay. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
Which is to say, not at all.Not only does the Court of Appeal's holding make very little doctrinal sense, but it's also fundamentally bad policy. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
(It's actually a neat little trick. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:07 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:29 am
Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
One of the most closely-watched cases is Kansas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:08 pm
[A surreal colloquy from U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
United States, 556 U.S.___ (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:17 pm
Supreme Court “wrongfully” decided Kelo v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:13 am
Board of Education.Hunsaker, an Oregon state judge slated for a long-vacant Portland posting left in 2016 by now-Senior Circuit Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain, faced little resistance from the few present committee members. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:53 pm
Mukasey, No. 07-3031 Where Petitioner's state drug conviction could have been for nonremunerative transfer of as little as two grams of marijuana, his conviction is the equivalent of a federal misdemeanor under the Controlled Substances Act and therefore not an aggravated felony under the INA. [read post]
