Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 801 - 820
of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
Rejecting that request, in McFarlane v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
It will come into force on “such day as the Secretary of State may appoint”. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Schwartz – Section Vice Chair, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP PLENARY SESSION #1, 9:15 a.m. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:34 am
References below to legislation are to ITEPA unless stated otherwise. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
On that day, the Respondent’s solicitor stated orally in court that an appeal would be lodged against the extradition order, and on 16 December 2015, the notice of application for leave to appeal was filed with the Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
This principle was also adopted in Canada, with the Supreme Court of Canada stating in 1978 in Elsley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
At present, the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012, reg 35(15) prohibits the misconduct hearing from stating whether any decision was unanimous or by majority. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Tannenbaum also stated that Shantou and F&V’s new counsel, Locke Lord, had indicated that it would oppose the motion – but the order states that Locke Lord later withdrew its opposition. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
Heffernan v Rent Service [2009] EWHC 3539 (Admin) Mr Heffernan has renewed his battle with Sheffield's rent officers with a new appearance before the High Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
Heffernan v Rent Service [2009] EWHC 3539 (Admin) Mr Heffernan has renewed his battle with Sheffield's rent officers with a new appearance before the High Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
Harley Lord, et al., 851 So.2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
This is certainly consistent with the reasoning in Samsung v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which considered the surface decoration on the accused product, despite that Apple’s CRD for the iPad was depicted in line drawings. [read post]
