Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 801 - 820 of 4,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
This case offers several lessons for reducing exposure: a court is likely to assess (i) whether decision makers took a truly careful and thoughtful review of the evidence; (ii) whether independent decision makers were introduced to take a fresh look at the evidence; (iii) whether the problem employee was asked for his or her side of the story before finalizing the termination; (iv) whether a cat’s paw angle was meaningfully analyzed and ruled out; and (v) whether… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
This case offers several lessons for reducing exposure: a court is likely to assess (i) whether decision makers took a truly careful and thoughtful review of the evidence; (ii) whether independent decision makers were introduced to take a fresh look at the evidence; (iii) whether the problem employee was asked for his or her side of the story before finalizing the termination; (iv) whether a cat’s paw angle was meaningfully analyzed and ruled out; and (v) whether… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am by Katharine Van Tassel
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm by Shaw Drake
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion on a patent matter for AstraZeneca, the makers of Crestor. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion on a patent matter for AstraZeneca, the makers of Crestor. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by vforberger
DWD could be stating here that being quarantined is good cause. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on Microsoft v AT&T, a dispute over patent infringement abroad. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Isabel McArdle
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]