Search for: "State v. Mart" Results 801 - 820 of 2,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 6:35 am by Elysia Cherry
Heenan Blaikie staff left in limbo in wake of firm’s ‘chaotic’ disintegrationWhat R v Big M Drug Mart Can Teach the US Supreme Court about Corporate Religious FreedomAttorney client privilege is so 20th century"More than 40 percent of robberies in NYC involve smartphones and cell phones." [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
El Martes 11 de Febrero, organizaciones de derechos digitales, grupos de la sociedad civil, los autores y los usuarios de Internet a través de seis continentes saldrán a las calles digitales para exigir el fin de la vigilancia masiva. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Wal-Mart * Employee Termination Based on Mistaken Belief of Facebook Post Authorship Upheld — Smizer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
With respect to the BOE’s contention that the District Court should have decertified the entire class based Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
  First, the court noted that the statute virtually forced courts to “select among trifles” and rejected the view, akin to its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by Jake McGowan
Wal-Mart * Employee Termination Based on Mistaken Belief of Facebook Post Authorship Upheld — Smizer v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:26 am by John Lewis
  The class certification issues involved provide the Court an opportunity to build on its landmark decisions, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Suppose Wal-Mart put cameras in employee bathrooms to monitor productivity—Wal-Mart has a similar interest in that stall. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:22 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit got its third consecutive unanimous reversal on Tuesday, when the Court decided its first class action case of the year, Mississippi v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Concluding there was ample evidence that Walmart was a joint employer of the workers at its warehouse in Mira Loma, California, a federal district court rejected the retailer’s motion for summary judgment on the workers’ FLSA and wage and related claims under state law (Carrillo v Schneider Logistics Trans-Loading and Distribution, Inc, January 14, 2014, Snyder, C). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In its ruling, the Court of Appeals confirmed that, because Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 42 was “patterned after Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are instructive,” including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]