Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 801 - 820 of 1,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by Celia Taylor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rehear the First Amendment portion of the conflict minerals case (Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
The SEC is seeking a rehearing because the same court granted en banc rehearing in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
After eight years as an underground miner, the miner, along with about 60 other employees, was laid off as part of a reduction in force. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:25 am
This one's sure to take your breath away, perhaps literally, as she presents a last letter from a dying miner caught in a 1902 collapse, and takes to task public authorities both here and in Turkey for failing to safeguard the lives of contemporary miners. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:29 am
A decision from the United States Tax Court in December 2013 has interesting implications for Texas oil and gas leases and Texas mineral owners. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am by Andrew Alberg
In the Court’s opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts (writing for the majority) drew an analogy to Great Northern Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 1:00 pm
  Based on the language cited by the court, we consider Delaware a state that has adopted alternative design as a prerequisite to a design defect claim. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:13 am by Diane Marie Amann
The ultimate object of all modern war is a renewed state of peace. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am by David Lynn
Court of Appeals decision came out earlier this week in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Steven Chadwick
On April 8, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of the State of Ohio issued its opinion in the matter of Walker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:22 am by Larry
If you have not been following the International Custom Products, Inc. v. [read post]