Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 801 - 820 of 42,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In a resounding victory for policyholders, an Oklahoma state court granted partial summary judgment for the Cherokee Nation in its COVID-19 business interruption claim. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:30 am
Since the 2005 decision, 40 states have passed legislation limiting the state government's power of eminent domain for economic development. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:30 am by John Bellinger
I want to supplement Elena Chachko’s useful analysis of Wednesday’s International Court of Justice decision in the case of Iran v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 8/31/17. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Trial Courtshttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.html State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 10/31/18. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 2:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Freedom of Information Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlLavallie v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Despite Truman’s argument that his position as commander-in-chief afforded him the power to make all military decisions, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 7:41 am
Robert Chesney (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted State Secrets and the Limits of National Security Litigation (George Washington Law Review, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]