Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 801 - 820 of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
David, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, UK, “Familial Imagination in Law and Religion&r [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
I have occasionally on this blog taken the opportunity to praise a prosecutor for exemplifying the role eloquently described by Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Civil Resistance and Power Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
One difficulty is that, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am by Cristina Mariottini
Mariottini, Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law: Henry Deeb GABRIEL, Contracts for the Sale of Goods – A Comparison of U.S. and International Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. v-401. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm by David Lat
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]