Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 801 - 820 of 45,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the Criminal Court complaint, a paralegal with the Kings County District Attorney's Office states that she is informed by Police Officer KK that on or about 19 April 2009, at 7:32 P.M. at 390 Nostrand Avenue, County of Kings, City and State of New York, defendant was in possession of crack cocaine. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm by Guest Blogger
v     What’s law got to do with it? [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by ISOBELLE WILLIAMS
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mark Graber
Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent from a denial of certiorari in Storman’s Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
There may -- perhaps -- be good test cases in which you might argue that a state prohibition against incest violates the Due Process Clause. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 1:46 am
Some of you may recall this post from last month about the Palmer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
People of the State of New York (1925) Stromberg v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:28 pm
  As well as remind me of the scene in "Superbad" in which the officers tell "McLovin":  "A lot of people have weird names lately . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Here's a crime that doesn't fill up a plethora of pages in the California Appellate Reports:  a state criminal prosecution of the owner of twelve Subway restaurants for underpaying state sales tax revenue.Notwithstanding the prosecution, white collar criminals everywhere should be happy at the underlying events. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]